On Jun 28, 2008, at 3:12 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote:
Since as Dino said in his e-mail "none of the LISP authors felt
that LISP was the ultimate long-term solution", LISP may
not matter over the long term, and therefore it really does not
matter whether LISP will reduce the cost of multi-homing _over the
long term_.
But what if it does? Do you really want to play crystal ball and
make such a bet?
Long before Alan Greenspan, someone said "There is nothing as
permanent as the temporary."
That is not a bet I would like to make.
BTW, it might amuse people to see that SOHO multihoming is in slashdot
today.
http://ask.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/28/1728224
Regards
Marshall
Dino
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
