Dave, > Yakov, > > On Jun 26, 2008, at 6:53 AM, Yakov Rekhter wrote: > > LISP is *not* going to reduce the cost of multi-homing. To the > > contrary, LISP is going to make the cost of multihoming higher than > > it is today. > > LISP, or something like it, would reduce the cost of multi-homing > _over the long term_.
Since as Dino said in his e-mail "none of the LISP authors felt that LISP was the ultimate long-term solution", LISP may not matter over the long term, and therefore it really does not matter whether LISP will reduce the cost of multi-homing _over the long term_. > > Moreover, LISP would would place this cost not only on the enterprises > > that want to do multihoming, but on other parties as well (which > > would result in mis-alignment of cost relative to benefits). > > Would this purported mis-alignment be better or worse than PI-for- > everybody? Could you point me to any document that shows that mis-alignment with LISP would be *significantly* less than with what we have today ? Yakov. -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
