On Jan 10, 2008 6:07 PM, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey now! Really though, have you ever been digging through old > mailing lists and wondered which version they were using when they had > that issue? Or when someone posts and issue, you need to ask them > what versions of everything they're using? It can be a pain and it > usually wastes time/energy, so this is a simple solution. :)
I wasn't criticizing. It cracks me up in the sort of "that's so obvious, I should do it myself' sort of way. > > Nathan Sutton > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > rspec 1.1 > rspec_on_rails 1.1 > rails 2.0.2 > > > On Jan 10, 2008, at 6:04 PM, David Chelimsky wrote: > > > On Jan 10, 2008 6:02 PM, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> Nathan Sutton > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> rspec 1.1 > >> rspec_on_rails 1.1 > >> rails 2.0.2 > > > > I love that your sig has your rspec and rails versions. That cracks > > me up. > > > _______________________________________________ > > rspec-users mailing list > > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
