On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 26 Mar 2008, at 19:08, Kyle Hargraves wrote: > > > I finally got around to registering a project on RubyForge and pushing > > a gem, so it is now available with just: > > > > gem install rspec_hpricot_matchers > > > Hi Kyle > > Thanks for releasing this as a gem, makes it much easier to get hold > of. The only deficiency in it that bugs me is the poor error > reporting for nested specs, but that would be pretty tough to fix. > (I'd love to think I could add that but not sure I will get time.) > > I still think this should be in RSpec core though, hint hint > David ;o) Is there any chance it will make it in?
Not likely. Not because it isn't awesome. I'll probably be using it myself. But every good idea for a matcher library doesn't belong in rspec. In fact, the whole point of creating such a simple protocol for matchers was to encourage external libraries. I think it's fine just as it is. FWIW, David > Making assertions > about XML data is pretty common doing both web-based and non-web-based > apps. Plus of course there is the little issue that Rails' > assert_select doesn't *actually work*, which is generally considered a > requirement for a testing library. > > Ashley > > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
