On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Ashley Moran
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  On 26 Mar 2008, at 19:08, Kyle Hargraves wrote:
>
>  > I finally got around to registering a project on RubyForge and pushing
>  > a gem, so it is now available with just:
>  >
>  >  gem install rspec_hpricot_matchers
>
>
>  Hi Kyle
>
>  Thanks for releasing this as a gem, makes it much easier to get hold
>  of.  The only deficiency in it that bugs me is the poor error
>  reporting for nested specs, but that would be pretty tough to fix.
>  (I'd love to think I could add that but not sure I will get time.)
>
>  I still think this should be in RSpec core though, hint hint
>  David ;o)  Is there any chance it will make it in?

Not likely. Not because it isn't awesome. I'll probably be using it
myself. But every good idea for a matcher library doesn't belong in
rspec. In fact, the whole point of creating such a simple protocol for
matchers was to encourage external libraries.

I think it's fine just as it is.

FWIW,
David

> Making assertions
>  about XML data is pretty common doing both web-based and non-web-based
>  apps.  Plus of course there is the little issue that Rails'
>  assert_select doesn't *actually work*, which is generally considered a
>  requirement for a testing library.




>
>  Ashley
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  rspec-users mailing list
>  rspec-users@rubyforge.org
>  http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
>
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users

Reply via email to