+1 On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Ashley Moran < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27/03/2008, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Not likely. Not because it isn't awesome. I'll probably be using it > > myself. But every good idea for a matcher library doesn't belong in > > rspec. In fact, the whole point of creating such a simple protocol for > > matchers was to encourage external libraries. > > > > I think it's fine just as it is. > > > > In that case, would a central repository of re-usable matchers be a good > idea? (Maybe just a page on rspec.info?) > > > Ashley > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- http://www.coreyhaines.com The Internet's Premiere source of information about Corey Haines
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
