On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Joseph Wilk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like a nice shortcut for those times when you are registering > simple one-off listeners. > > While it does provide a nice shortcut I can see reasons why that > shortcut might be bad(in some cases). > > Separating registering and implementation can be a good thing. > *Split the logic. > *Organise files/classes nicely > *Enable inheritance from the listeners > > If it was anything that I had to maintain or touch regularly I would be > happier with a class. > > Can/Could you support mixins inside FunctionalStruct? That would help > overcome some of those points.
Yeah you definitely could, perhaps something like: FunctionalStruct.new( SomeModule, :foo => ..., :bar => ..., ) > I can think of a couple of places that I would be happy using > FunctionalStruct. Is the source for 'FunctionalStruct' > written/available? http://github.com/zdennis/functional_struct/tree/master -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com http://www.mutuallyhuman.com _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
