On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:29 AM, aslak hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 2:25 AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something, >> yet I want something readable and concise. This is influenced from the >> joys of JavaScript. >> >> Today I made this happen. Love it, like it, hate it, WDYT? >> > > As mentioned earlier on the RSpec development list, we're considering > replacing the Story runner with a new implementation: > > http://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber > http://gojko.net/2008/08/06/cucumber-next-generation-ruby-bdd-tool/ > http://www.nabble.com/-ANN--Cucumber-td18876816.html > > > I'd rather see a similar construct for Cucumber, which already is > (IMHO) much better than the Story Runner. > > > Before(:all) do > end > > After(:all) do > end > > (per-scenarion Before/After is already implemented). >
When you say "rather see a similar construct" -- are you referring to having the Before(:all) and After(:all) capability that you posted, or something similar to what I posted with using a FuncionalStruct as an argument to register a listener on the existing StoryRunner (a clear/concise way to hook-in with those one off listeners) ? -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com http://www.mutuallyhuman.com _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
