Are you willing to provide a simple example? Andy
Matt Wynne wrote: > We do something similar to this, though we use a convention to set > @klass to the class being spec'd in the top-level example group, > rather than deriving it as they do in that sample. > > In view specs we also use a convention to always have a do_render > method available, so that we can bring in similarly shared / generated > examples. > > It's great for speccing two sublcasses which have some common > behaviour, where it feels wrong to spec the (abstract) base class. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
