On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Andy Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you willing to provide a simple example?
I'm using the same example as the articled you linked to originally as the base. This way you should be able to clearly see the differences. http://gist.github.com/13804 Zach > > Andy > > Matt Wynne wrote: >> We do something similar to this, though we use a convention to set >> @klass to the class being spec'd in the top-level example group, >> rather than deriving it as they do in that sample. >> >> In view specs we also use a convention to always have a do_render >> method available, so that we can bring in similarly shared / generated >> examples. >> >> It's great for speccing two sublcasses which have some common >> behaviour, where it feels wrong to spec the (abstract) base class. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Zach Dennis http://www.continuousthinking.com http://www.mutuallyhuman.com _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
