On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Andy Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Chelimsky wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:41 AM, Andy Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Are you willing to provide a simple example? >>>> >>>> I'm using the same example as the articled you linked to originally as >>>> the base. This way you should be able to clearly see the differences. >>>> >>>> http://gist.github.com/13804 >> >> Here's a variation on that with a helper for defining macros that I'm >> thinking of adding to rspec. Lemme know what you think: >> >> http://gist.github.com/13821
> What's not to like?! Despite the fact that a new RSpec version was just > released, it would be nice to see a new version released right away with > this concept built in so that a RSpec version of Shoulda could start > rolling. :) Not quite sure how we got from discussing an idea to release planning, but the idea of a shoulda-like library built on this is a good one. If you're planning on writing one, no need to wait for this to appear in rspec. It's 3 lines of code that you could include in such a library until such time as it is released w/ RSpec. Cheers, David >> >> Cheers, >> David _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
