On 19-Dec-24 16:06, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hiya,
On 19/12/2024 02:24, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
I also don't think that the current errata system really creates a
big workload. We have a big backlog, but that seems to be due to
low prioritization (and I think that's a collective error).
I think that's an erroneous diagnosis of the problem. The current
system is so bad, for all concerned, it causes most people to
de-prioritise errata processing would be my take. We should chuck
it out and replace it entirely.
I'm not disputing that we need a better system. You may be right
that we (all of us) have not prioritized errata handling precisely
because of the inconvenience of the system, hence the backlog.
Brian
--
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org
