Hiya,
On 26/05/2026 22:28, Eliot Lear wrote:
On 26.05.2026 21:58, Eric Rescorla wrote:Second, I do not believe that the Editorial stream is an appropriate place to set this kind of policy. Ignoring questions about stream specificity, I think it's clear that there are substantive questions of policy here which should be resolved by IETF Consensus (or whatever process is appropriate to the Streams).The IESG can actually seek that consensus as part of the RSAB approval process, but beyond that, THIS procedure is entirely open to the rough consensus process. That's by design. Your design, I might add, as you not only were part of the consensus that created 9280, you drove it.
There have been documents that were approved by the IAB and at the same time, underwent IETF LC. Something like that could be tried here. Not sure if I think that's a good or bad plan TBH, but absent such, I think I agree with Ekr that a thing like this kinda needs IETF consensus to be credible. Cheers, S.
Eliot
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
