On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 3:17 PM Eliot Lear <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27.05.2026 00:06, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > Well, that's in fact the rationale for the whole RFC 9280 process. > However, my objection doesn't depend on it, but merely that the RFC 9280 > process does not in fact demonstrate IETF consensus. > > Since anyone can participate in this consensus that is a distinction > without a difference, especially when anyone can inform the IETF > participants. > I've already explained why I don't believe that this is the case.
At this point, I think we're largely repeating ourselves, so perhaps it's easiest if we just table this discussion for now. If the chairs decide to issue a consensus call, we can have this debate then. -Ekr
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
