It appears that Colin Perkins <[email protected]> said: >Every definition of plagiarism I can find talks about misrepresenting another >person’s work as your own. I don’t see plagiarism concerns >in our processes, provided appropriate credit is given.
You beat me to it. Copyright infringement is sort of related but not at all the same. As others have noted, our processes encourage people to reuse prior RFCs and drafts, and I would expect the same to apply to other sources that permit reuse. R's, John -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
