Hiya,
On 27/05/2026 02:43, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
While I feel sure we need to say "no plagiarism",
Is that actually well-defined for I-Ds? We have a tradition that someone can pick up the ball and run with it, whenever something needs revising. That mostly involves earlier text authors being involved but not always. Similarly, we often copy chunks of text from document A to document B without asking the authors of A. Those are almost never problematic with our boilerplate (and are almost always done well), but I dunno if there's a definition of plagiarism that fits what we want. I'm also not sure we want to make a local definition of plagiarism. Cheers, S.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
