Jay > On Jun 4, 2026, at 6:26 PM, Jay Daley <[email protected]> wrote: Snip
> > I don’t think the "who wrote it" is the right lens for this. I suspect that > the big issue here is the likely huge increase in uncopyrightable text in our > documents. Sure we already have public domain/uncopyrighted text, but from > my limited viewpoint it seems minor and rare, whereas we can foresee a future > where it is major and commonplace. When that happens, I don’t think our > rules/processes will be adequate and an evolution will be needed to address > that. To give you a concrete example, we prevent non-IETF derivatives of > IETF standards for good reasons, but if/when a standard has significant AI > output incorporated into it, even if that’s light editing, will we be able to > continue with that level of protection? Note that the authors can do anything they want to do, we have no role You say - “preventing non-IETF derivatives of IETF standards” is something the IETF does - can you provide specific examples of the IETF doing this? Scott. (Trying to understand why you think that AI disclosure is important (or even useful) Scott -- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
