On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 7:54 AM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Mirja Kuehlewind \(IETF\) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreed! > I think that it would be brilliant if an AD review told the WG: > "Yeah, that document is not an Updates-123, it's an Updates-545, right?" > > WG: Oh yeah, we didn't change our meta-data as our I-D evolved into being > better at interoperating with old thing FOO. > This seems like the optimistic view. The pessimistic view is that it will usher in a whole new round of arguments about whether it should be Updates-123 or Updates-545. > > > Also my question is what’s the harm I trying it. If it doesn’t help, > we > > stop it again. However, I think there is a chance to at least improve > > the situation even though we might not fix all issues entirely. > > +1 > In addition to the concern above, namely creating new arguments about which tag applies, if it turns out not to work, we end up with a bunch of confusing and no-longer-used tags in perpetuity. -Ekr
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
