On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 1:10 PM Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <[email protected]> wrote:
> See inline. > > On 7. Jul 2026, at 20:19, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 9:38 AM Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> The discussion on which tag applies would be at least based on something >> written and consensus based and not just on differing strong opinions about >> how to do it right. That should make the discussion easier and also create >> less of them. That’s the goal! Maybe it wouldn’t avoid it entirely but I >> don’t think that a good reason to not do it as I don’t think there is a >> perfect solution (and probably there don’t need to be one; sometimes you >> simply need to have a discussion and make a decision). >> > > I'm sorry, I don't agree. My view is that adding more tags with detailed > guidelines is just as likely to create more debate, not less. If we are to > do something here, I would instead replace both Obsoletes and Updates with > some variant of "look over here" or "you might be interested in", thus > avoiding any debate. > > > That’s why we also added the “see also” tag. > And if you were proposing just to replace Updates with "see also" I would feel differently. > Why do you think that “amends” and “extends” are not clear? > It's not a matter of whether I think they are clear. It's a matter of whether I think it's a good idea to try to draw these distinctions. -Ekr
-- rswg mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
