+-- On 09/01/00 01:23:14 -0400 "Bradley M. Kuhn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Martin Pool wrote:
|
| > It seems pertinent to ask if anyone knows whether changing the ctime
| > rather than the atime will make the mail agents any happier about the
| file > being unmodified? There's no point implementing it if it won't
| solve the > problem.
|
| I use mutt, and when I use my preserve-atime-patch, things work right.
| Without it, things don't (mutt thinks none of my new mailboxes have new
| mail after I rsync them).
What happens when your system is backed up?
/Michael
