> Rainer Gerhards wrote: > > Used the wrong words ;) Of course, this should read: > > > > Sure, but let me phrase it that way: My interest is finding bugs, > support > > questions often lead to that. If there is no bug involved, my > personal > > interest in support is *extremely limited*. Still, there is the rest > of > > the community, and they often provide advice. So Adiscon created the > > commercial support for corporations that want to have a solution and > save > > time while doing so. > > > > And: why is my interest limited? Support to get someone else going > > contributes almost nothing back to the project... > > > Im going to make probes with deleting the config line EST=... > > When we have coclusion I will tell you, and I will back my concluison > to > this magic project. :)
I have taken another look at the log files in the meantime, assuming that $EST were not present ;) However, I do not see anything obviously wrong. But I think I remember there was a condition that caused messages to be processed to slowly. Probably the best idea is to see if the issue persists with the current v3-stable release. If it does, we should go to v4 and if it still persists we need to obtain debug logs. But I think chances are extremely high that the current v3-stable will solve it. however, those forwarding rules to $EST can never have worked, and may actually be overruning the retry mechanism after a while... Rainer _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
