Rainer Gerhards wrote: > So my conclusion really is that you need to look at the NFS layer.
Logs should NEVER be written to an NFS mount. David gave a good explanation as to why. But the above prohibition should be made clear in the docs, if it isn't already. If the NFS server goes away, then the write transaction rate will go to zero. This likely isn't what people want from a syslog server. There is already a way to get syslog data from one system to another: the syslog protocol. Using NFS as a replacement for syslog is wrong on many levels. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com
