Some quick notes:

David is right with the versioning - I overlooked that. Not a big deal, i
need to pull into the central repo.

Small html is good.

Breaking urls is not a problem: we can do redirects (own infrastructure
;)). That's ok with google. One day of very boring work at most.

Rainer

Sent from phone, thus brief.
Am 13.12.2013 21:29 schrieb "David Lang" <[email protected]>:

> On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Pavel Levshin wrote:
>
>  13.12.2013 22:19, David Lang:
>>
>>> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Pavel Levshin wrote:
>>>
>>>  Newest version of docs which is published on the site is not very
>>>> reliable when you are not brave one using bleeding edge software. You never
>>>> know if this doc applies to you setup.
>>>>
>>>
>>> lots of things in the docs talk about what version they were introduced
>>> in, more things need to have version tags added.
>>>
>>
>> Those tags are of no use, if the document is applied to one known
>> version, only. I personally think that there tags make docs overloaded with
>> unnecessary historic information. This is like having version control
>> system and still describing each change in commentaries.
>>
>
> Since rsyslog has really good backwards compatability, almost all these
> tags end up being 'introduced in vx.y.z' which is a fairly small impact.
>
>  It would be better for users to have several versions of docs on the
>>>> site, at least, for major branches as 5-stable, 7-stable, 7-devel and
>>>> master. It may increase you traffic, though.
>>>>
>>>
>>> well, the community only supports the latest version, right? ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> I don't think so, at least 7-stable, 7-devel and 8-devel are supported
>> now. And previous version is also good to have, just to show its
>> deficiencies.
>>
>
> I should have said we only support one stable version, you are correct in
> the versions supported now, but it's usually just one -stable and one
> -devel with the features added in -devel going into a stable before very
> long.
>
> David Lang
> _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to