I think for part of it it is inevitable.  We could  try to keep as much as
possible.  For the rest, we can do html pages that just link to the new
ones. Not perfect, but we need to change the structure in any case. ..

Sent from phone, thus brief.
Am 13.12.2013 22:26 schrieb "David Lang" <[email protected]>:

> On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
>
>  Some quick notes:
>>
>> David is right with the versioning - I overlooked that. Not a big deal, i
>> need to pull into the central repo.
>>
>> Small html is good.
>>
>> Breaking urls is not a problem: we can do redirects (own infrastructure
>> ;)). That's ok with google. One day of very boring work at most.
>>
>
> you also break the knowledge of where to look for things in the lcoal
> docs. don't depend just on server level redirects.
>
> David Lang
>
>  Rainer
>>
>> Sent from phone, thus brief.
>> Am 13.12.2013 21:29 schrieb "David Lang" <[email protected]>:
>>
>>  On Sat, 14 Dec 2013, Pavel Levshin wrote:
>>>
>>>  13.12.2013 22:19, David Lang:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Pavel Levshin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Newest version of docs which is published on the site is not very
>>>>>
>>>>>> reliable when you are not brave one using bleeding edge software. You
>>>>>> never
>>>>>> know if this doc applies to you setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> lots of things in the docs talk about what version they were introduced
>>>>> in, more things need to have version tags added.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Those tags are of no use, if the document is applied to one known
>>>> version, only. I personally think that there tags make docs overloaded
>>>> with
>>>> unnecessary historic information. This is like having version control
>>>> system and still describing each change in commentaries.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Since rsyslog has really good backwards compatability, almost all these
>>> tags end up being 'introduced in vx.y.z' which is a fairly small impact.
>>>
>>>  It would be better for users to have several versions of docs on the
>>>
>>>> site, at least, for major branches as 5-stable, 7-stable, 7-devel and
>>>>>> master. It may increase you traffic, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> well, the community only supports the latest version, right? ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  I don't think so, at least 7-stable, 7-devel and 8-devel are supported
>>>> now. And previous version is also good to have, just to show its
>>>> deficiencies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I should have said we only support one stable version, you are correct in
>>> the versions supported now, but it's usually just one -stable and one
>>> -devel with the features added in -devel going into a stable before very
>>> long.
>>>
>>> David Lang
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rsyslog mailing list
>>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
>>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
>>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>> rsyslog mailing list
>> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
>> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
>> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
>> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
>> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
>> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> rsyslog mailing list
> http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
> http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
> What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
> NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad
> of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you
> DON'T LIKE THAT.
>
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to