2014/1/24 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:46 PM, Radu Gheorghe <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > 2014/1/24 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]> > > > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Radu Gheorghe < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > One more thing: does omprog accept queue.workerthreads? This would > > > > elegantly solve the multithreading problem by launching multiple > > > instances > > > > of the script. > > > > > > > > > > > It's buried in my answer to David in the other thread: weak "yes" - in > > > theory it does, but the actual capability is still on my todo list. > > Didn't > > > have that importance back in November. Maybe I have a quick lock now, > it > > > should not be very hard to do. From a design perspective, it's a clear > > > "Yes, and that is the reason it does". > > > > > > > I don't get it: you mean I can set it but it doesn't work now? > > > > > > > you can set it, and it works... but omprog has a mutex around the exec call > so that only one instance is ever used. > > > OK, got it now. I assume this would be fixed in some 8.1.x ? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
