2014-01-30 Rainer Gerhards <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Michael Biebl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I happen to be someone who both likes systemd and rsyslog and thinks >> both have their place. >> >> To be perfectly honest, I don't see it as much of a problem that a >> desktop oriented distro like Fedora comes with journal only in their >> desktop spin and imho for such use cases it makes sense to just use >> the journal only. >> > > I AGREE to this, and I think we have done a lot of work in regard to > journal interoperability. What I still see as a big problem is their "end > of line for syslog" argument that they used to push the initial version and > that other folks build on. By actually doing sysloggish things, but saying > "hey, we are not that obsolete technology". This sense of obsoletion has is > something that the journal folks unfortunately managed to inject very well > into the linux community.
I get your point. The classic sysklogd project from 10 years ago is no comparison what rsyslog can do today. David already started a separate thread regarding documentation. Maybe adding a introductionary section like "Is rsyslog the right tool for me?" where you explain the concepts and flexibility of rsyslog with different use cases and scenarios?. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ rsyslog mailing list http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/ What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE THAT.
