On 2014-10-30 23:38, David Lang wrote:

I'm actually thinking of the kernel model


+1 to that, personally I like the aim to a 3 month cycle.. this way there can be a steady stream of changes rather than a large merge (of possibly several month old changes) any issues can be picked up quickly and most of the changes will be fresh in the minds of those who made them :)
_______________________________________________
rsyslog mailing list
http://lists.adiscon.net/mailman/listinfo/rsyslog
http://www.rsyslog.com/professional-services/
What's up with rsyslog? Follow https://twitter.com/rgerhards
NOTE WELL: This is a PUBLIC mailing list, posts are ARCHIVED by a myriad of 
sites beyond our control. PLEASE UNSUBSCRIBE and DO NOT POST if you DON'T LIKE 
THAT.

Reply via email to