Dan,
I may be wrong, but I believe you can order the sequence of scrips by
the name field. I put a 1a, 1b, 2a, 2c in front of the name of several
scrips I have that run for the same transaction, but need them to run in
sequence. That and setting the TransactionBatch to 1 works for me. Hope
this helps. Hope this helps.
Kenn
LBNL
On 2/4/2009 10:34 AM, Dan O'Neill wrote:
> Jeremy Burke wrote:
>> I think you need 2 scrips. The scrip you have below and then another scrip
>> to send e-mail on create to the AdminCCs. You need to make sure the Add
>> AdminCC scrip you have below is executed before the scrip that sends to the
>> AdminCCs.
>>
>> I'm using RT 3.8.1 and this is how I have it setup to work. The 1 at the
>> beginning of Scrip #2's description forces this scrip to be run before scrip
>> #1
>
> Jeremy,
>
> Thanks for the information. This helps, but doesn't solve the problem
> because I'm using RT 3.4.5 which does not guarantee scrip order. Thus,
> an upgrade is likely to be the path I have to take. I really don't want
> to upgrade right now.
>
> This wiki article
> http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/TransactionBatchStage covers my
> problem well.
>
> Does anyone have a solution for rt 3.4.5?
>
> Dan
> _______________________________________________
> http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
>
> Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
> Commercial support: [email protected]
>
>
> Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
> Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
>
_______________________________________________
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com
Commercial support: [email protected]
Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media.
Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
