On Thu 19.Feb'09 at 11:42:42 -0500, Todd Chapman wrote: > According to FF the original file has an encoding of UTF-16LE. It was > generated by Word. (I know, I know) Now we're getting somewhere. Was it attached to a mail as an attachment? If so, what do the headers for the original attachment look like as they hit RT. If not, how did it get into RT? _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [email protected] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
- [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html attachment Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html attachment Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html attachment Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html attachment Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html attachme... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html att... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles html... Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Jesse Vincent
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Todd Chapman
- Re: [rt-users] RT 3.8 mangles ... Jesse Vincent
