> > > > I'm using RT::Client::REST against 3.8.2 just fine. > > Including access to Custom Fields? IIRC the current RT::Client::REST > release doesn't handle the new 3.8 style naming convention yet.
Yep. I could believe that there might be issues with escaping and very oddly named CFs, which, IIRC, was what we've fixed in recent RT but none that I've hit. _______________________________________________ http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users Community help: http://wiki.bestpractical.com Commercial support: [email protected] Discover RT's hidden secrets with RT Essentials from O'Reilly Media. Buy a copy at http://rtbook.bestpractical.com
