On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Sebastian Huber <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 2014-02-21 02:55, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>> >>>> >>I would prefer to see symmetry between our choice to use cpu_set_t as >>>> >>the opaque type for the cpu bit sets. Thus I recommend using the score >>>> >>name _Cpu_set for the handler. (It is unfortunate that we can't use >>>> >>_CPU_set because that would clash with the score CPU namespace.) >>> >>> >If we drop the _, it could be _CPUSet_Xxx. >> >> _CPUSet is ok. >> > > I prefer _CPU_set_Some_other_thing. > > -- > Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH > > Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany > Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 > Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 > E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de > PGP : Public key available on request. > > Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. > > _______________________________________________ > rtems-devel mailing list > rtems-devel@rtems.org > http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
_______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
