Last message had no body. Oops. On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Sebastian Huber > <sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: >> On 2014-02-21 02:55, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>I would prefer to see symmetry between our choice to use cpu_set_t as >>>>> >>the opaque type for the cpu bit sets. Thus I recommend using the score >>>>> >>name _Cpu_set for the handler. (It is unfortunate that we can't use >>>>> >>_CPU_set because that would clash with the score CPU namespace.) >>>> >>>> >If we drop the _, it could be _CPUSet_Xxx. >>> >>> _CPUSet is ok. >>> >> >> I prefer _CPU_set_Some_other_thing. >> The problem is that _CPU_set_Some_other_thing overlaps slightly with the _CPU_ namespace we use for cpu-dependent score code. However, since the "set" is not capitalized, we can differentiate the case. I also prefer _CPU_set_Xxx for symmetry with the type names we chose.
>> -- >> Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH >> >> Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany >> Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 >> Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 >> E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de >> PGP : Public key available on request. >> >> Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> rtems-devel mailing list >> rtems-devel@rtems.org >> http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel _______________________________________________ rtems-devel mailing list rtems-devel@rtems.org http://www.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/rtems-devel
