Hi Alexander, Thanks for your comments. We would be adding the IANA considerations in the next version of the draft for setting up a registry for VRRP Advert types.
Thanks, Nitish On 17/01/16 3:34 pm, "Alexander Vainshtein" <[email protected]> wrote: >Hi all, >I have read the draft and I have one (presumably, minor) comment: >- The IANA Considerations section of says that there are no IANA request. >- At the same time the draft defines a new type of VRRP messages (2 - >Backup Advertisement). > >As long as here was just one type of VRRP messages (1 - Advertisement), >we could avoid setting up a IANA registry for VRRP message types. If we >are going to have two, does not this justify setting up such a registry? > >Regards, >Sasha > >Office: +972-39266302 >Cell: +972-549266302 >Email: [email protected] > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rtg-bfd [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nitish Gupta >(nitisgup) >Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 11:31 AM >To: [email protected]; [email protected] >Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Aditya Dogra (addogra) >Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02.txt > >Hi, > >We had presented the Draft for VRRP BFD integration in IETF 93 and we had >taken care of all the comments that came as part of the WG meeting. >We had also merged the two drafts as per the comments in IETF 93: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-01 >https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case-00 > >We had presented the merged draft in IETF 94 and there were no specific >comments on the draft. >We would like to ask the RTGWG to adopt the Draft as a WG document. > >Thanks, >Nitish > > >On 26/10/15 11:57 am, "Nitish Gupta (nitisgup)" <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>We have submitted a new version of the draft. As discussed in IETF 93 >>at prague. >> >>We have merged the following drafts: >>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-01 >> >>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case-00 >> >> >> >>We have also taken care of all the comments that were discussed in the >>RTGWG meeting. >>We welcome any comments and suggestions on the draft. >> >>Thanks, >>Nitish >> >>On 13/10/15 9:09 pm, "[email protected]" >><[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> >>>A new version of I-D, draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02.txt has been >>>successfully submitted by Nitish Gupta and posted to the IETF >>>repository. >>> >>>Name: draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd >>>Revision: 02 >>>Title: Fast failure detection in VRRP with BFD >>>Document date: 2015-10-13 >>>Group: Individual Submission >>>Pages: 10 >>>URL: >>>https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02.txt >>>Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd/ >>>Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02 >>>Diff: >>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02 >>> >>>Abstract: >>> This document describes how Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) >>> can be used to support sub-second detection of a Master Router >>> failure in the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >>>tools.ietf.org. >>> >>>The IETF Secretariat >>> >> >
