Shouldn’t the draft be named draft-nitish-bfd-vrrp or something like that to follow the naming convention described in RFC 7221?
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 11:27 PM, Nitish Gupta (nitisgup) <nitis...@cisco.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > We have submitted a new version of the draft. As discussed in IETF 93 at > prague. > > We have merged the following drafts: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-01 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case-00 > > > > We have also taken care of all the comments that were discussed in the > RTGWG meeting. > We welcome any comments and suggestions on the draft. > > Thanks, > Nitish > > On 13/10/15 9:09 pm, "internet-dra...@ietf.org" <internet-dra...@ietf.org> > wrote: > >> >> A new version of I-D, draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Nitish Gupta and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd >> Revision: 02 >> Title: Fast failure detection in VRRP with BFD >> Document date: 2015-10-13 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 10 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02.txt >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd/ >> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02 >> Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-nitish-vrrp-bfd-02 >> >> Abstract: >> This document describes how Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) >> can be used to support sub-second detection of a Master Router >> failure in the Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP). >> >> >> >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> > Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
