Kindly request for update on this please!

Regards
V.Rajaguru
XR/BFD/PI

From: Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 9:16 AM
To: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]>; Reshad Rahman <[email protected]>
Cc: t petch <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Rajaguru Veluchamy 
(rvelucha) <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang-05.txt

HI Team,

Would request for your kind opinion on this please.

Let me know for any question over here glad to reply.

Regards
V.Rajaguru
XR/BFD/PI

From: Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 3:23 PM
To: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Reshad Rahman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: t petch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: New Version Notification for draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang-05.txt

HI Team,


Can we have WG adoption for this draft please.



https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang/

Regards
V.Rajaguru
XR/BFD/PI

From: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 5:51 AM
To: Reshad Rahman <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: t petch <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Rajaguru 
Veluchamy (rvelucha) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Rajaguru 
Veluchamy (rvelucha) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang-05.txt

Reshad,


On Apr 25, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Reshad Rahman 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
<RR> Not just the name, but the description. In this case the description says 
"running in hardware".  Sometimes that line is blurry, e.g. is VPP considered 
hardware? Should the description instead say something along the times of 
"running in forwarding plane".

[...]

<RR> The BFD implementation I worked on many years ago was distributed to 
linecards for SH (for scale) but was not "offloaded", in that there was no h/w 
assist.

A good distinction.  Juniper has implementations that run on the "linecard CPU" 
and some that are built into the ASIC.

I don't know whether it's worth distinguishing the variants in the model.  For 
both of these cases, Juniper calls it "distributed".  However, "running on the 
linecards/forwarding plane" is a reasonable approximation.

-- Jeff


Reply via email to