Hi Rajaguru, Why would anyone not want a BFD session to be offloaded to hardware? Why would this be configurable? I don’t see this augmentation as useful.
Thanks, Acee > On Jul 17, 2023, at 11:13, Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kindly request for update on this please! > > Regards > V.Rajaguru > XR/BFD/PI > > From: Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 9:16 AM > To: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Reshad Rahman > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: t petch <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: RE: New Version Notification for > draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang-05.txt > > HI Team, > > Would request for your kind opinion on this please. > > Let me know for any question over here glad to reply. > > Regards > V.Rajaguru > XR/BFD/PI > > From: Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 3:23 PM > To: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Reshad Rahman > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: t petch <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: RE: New Version Notification for > draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang-05.txt > > HI Team, > > Can we have WG adoption for this draft please. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang/ > > Regards > V.Rajaguru > XR/BFD/PI > > From: Jeffrey Haas <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2023 5:51 AM > To: Reshad Rahman <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: t petch <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Rajaguru > Veluchamy (rvelucha) <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; > Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: New Version Notification for > draft-rvelucha-bfd-offload-yang-05.txt > > Reshad, > > > > On Apr 25, 2023, at 1:53 PM, Reshad Rahman <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > <RR> Not just the name, but the description. In this case the description > says "running in hardware". Sometimes that line is blurry, e.g. is VPP > considered hardware? Should the description instead say something along the > times of "running in forwarding plane". > > [...] > > > <RR> The BFD implementation I worked on many years ago was distributed to > linecards for SH (for scale) but was not "offloaded", in that there was no > h/w assist. > > A good distinction. Juniper has implementations that run on the "linecard > CPU" and some that are built into the ASIC. > > I don't know whether it's worth distinguishing the variants in the model. > For both of these cases, Juniper calls it "distributed". However, "running > on the linecards/forwarding plane" is a reasonable approximation. > > -- Jeff
