Hi Gorry,

Thank you for the confirmation.
I'll change the text as suggested by Dhruv to add a reference to RFC 5082.

Cheers,
Xiao Min


Original


From: Gorry(erg) <[email protected]>
To: 肖敏10093570;
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;
Date: 2024年10月17日 18:50
Subject: [Last-Call] Re: UDP Guidelines and draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-12


-- 
last-call mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]



On 17 Oct 2024, at 09:45, [email protected] wrote:





Hi Dhruv,

Thank you for the prompt feedback.
Please see inline.



I do think the addition of the reference helps. Thanks. 
This gives context and informs people who might like being creative with 
different ways to design this mechanism.
Gorry












From: DhruvDhody <[email protected]>
To: 肖敏10093570;
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;[email protected] 
<[email protected]>;
Date: 2024年10月17日 16:32
Subject: [Last-Call] Re: UDP Guidelines and draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo-12


-- 
last-call mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]



Hi Xiao,




[XM]>>> I can add the reference to RFC 5082 back to this document, if no 
objection from Dhruv (who had that concern). Propose to change the text as 
below.
OLD


All Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets for the session MUST be sent with a Time to 
Live (TTL) or Hop Limit value of 255, and received with a TTL or Hop Limit 
value of 254, otherwise the received packets MUST be dropped.NEW
All Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets for the session MUST be sent with a Time to 
Live (TTL) or Hop Limit value of 255, and received with a TTL or Hop Limit 
value of 254, otherwise the received packets MUST be dropped ([RFC5082] 
Appendix A).END






Dhruv: I would have been happy with rephrasing the text in such a way that 
referencing 5082 made sense. Would this be better - 


"All Unaffiliated BFD Echo packets for the session MUST be sent with a Time to 
Live (TTL) or Hop Limit value of 255. Received packets MUST have a TTL or Hop 
Limit value of 254 (similar to Appendix A of [RFC5082] to verify against a 
configured number of hops); otherwise, the received packets MUST be 
dropped."[XM]>>> Yes, your text looks better to me. How about Jeff and Gorry?

Reply via email to