Alia, Alvaro, I support adoption.
As requested, below some (quickly written) opinions: Positive: ++ Incremental deployment with incremental benefits. (Eventually some focused deployments may be enough to solve the main LFA limitations.) + Relatively easy understanding (and possibly control) for the network operator of the path taken by the traffic. Useful for capacity planning, network manageability and respect of design rules (e.g. don't use a PE to backup a P) + Relative simplicity + Can provide 100% coverage in some real networks. (at least one I am aware of) Negative: - "esthetic": some "random" (from human design perspective) mesh of control plane sessions. May have an impact on the management/monitoring. (e.g. how many T-LDP sessions am I supposed on have on node XT6 ? Is one missing?). - lacks 100% guaranteed coverage. Could eventually be worked on (e.g. studies, addition of (virtual TE) links) but requires work :-) Positive definitely outweighs the negative. IMHO will be deployed, with or without the IETF. I would prefer with the IETF review and standardization. Regards, Bruno >From Alia Atlas >Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 6:59 PM >Subject: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft > >draft-shand-remote-lfa was presented favorably this last IETF. There >is known IPR >associated with it on file ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1770/ ) > This draft presents >a solution for IP/LDP fast-reroute that does not guarantee 100% >coverage but can substantially >improve coverage over LFAs. > >We would like to initiate a WG poll to determine whether to adopt >draft-shand-remote-lfa. >We are, of course, interested in opinions and reasoning rather than >simple yes/no. > >Thanks, >Alia >_______________________________________________ >rtgwg mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
