Alia, I support the WG adopting draft-shand-remote-lfa. It provides a straightforward, low cost, and effective extension to LFAs.
Thanks, John Sent from my iPhone >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >Of Alia Atlas >Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 9:59 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft > >draft-shand-remote-lfa was presented favorably this last IETF. There is >known IPR associated with it on file ( >https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1770/ ) This draft presents a solution >for IP/LDP fast-reroute that does not guarantee 100% coverage but can >substantially improve coverage over LFAs. > >We would like to initiate a WG poll to determine whether to adopt draft- >shand-remote-lfa. >We are, of course, interested in opinions and reasoning rather than >simple yes/no. > >Thanks, >Alia >_______________________________________________ >rtgwg mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
