Support. Russ
On 5/31/2012 6:24 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Alia, Alvaro, > > I support adoption. > > As requested, below some (quickly written) opinions: > > Positive: > ++ Incremental deployment with incremental benefits. > (Eventually some focused deployments may be enough to solve the main LFA > limitations.) > + Relatively easy understanding (and possibly control) for the network > operator of the path taken by the traffic. Useful for capacity planning, > network manageability and respect of design rules (e.g. don't use a PE to > backup a P) > + Relative simplicity > + Can provide 100% coverage in some real networks. (at least one I am aware > of) > > > Negative: > - "esthetic": some "random" (from human design perspective) mesh of control > plane sessions. May have an impact on the management/monitoring. (e.g. how > many T-LDP sessions am I supposed on have on node XT6 ? Is one missing?). > - lacks 100% guaranteed coverage. Could eventually be worked on (e.g. > studies, addition of (virtual TE) links) but requires work :-) > > > Positive definitely outweighs the negative. > IMHO will be deployed, with or without the IETF. I would prefer with the IETF > review and standardization. > > Regards, > Bruno > >>From Alia Atlas >Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 6:59 PM >> Subject: opinions on adoption of draft-shand-remote-lfa as a WG draft >> >> draft-shand-remote-lfa was presented favorably this last IETF. There >> is known IPR >> associated with it on file ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1770/ ) >> This draft presents >> a solution for IP/LDP fast-reroute that does not guarantee 100% >> coverage but can substantially >> improve coverage over LFAs. >> >> We would like to initiate a WG poll to determine whether to adopt >> draft-shand-remote-lfa. >> We are, of course, interested in opinions and reasoning rather than >> simple yes/no. >> >> Thanks, >> Alia >> _______________________________________________ >> rtgwg mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg > > _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete > altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages > that have been modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg -- <>< [email protected] [email protected] _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
