On Dec 13, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: [ … ]
>> can we say that the PQ node address used for targeted LDP session is >> selected in following order of preference: >> >> 1. PQ node OSPF router-id, if it is advertised as /32 prefix by the PQ node >> itself >> >> 2. Highest /32 address advertised by PQ node in it's Router LSA > Why do we need (2). What do we do if an interface cycles? > > Surely the most we should say is that we SHOULD establish a TLDP session with > the > OSPF router-id, if it is advertised as /32 prefix by the PQ node itself, else > any > other IP address for the node may be used. other implementations may not be willing to accept T-LDP sessions on non-loopback adresses. /hannes _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
