Hannes,
On 13.12.2012 15:21, Hannes Gredler wrote:
On Dec 13, 2012, at 12:43 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
[ … ]
can we say that the PQ node address used for targeted LDP session is selected
in following order of preference:
1. PQ node OSPF router-id, if it is advertised as /32 prefix by the PQ node
itself
2. Highest /32 address advertised by PQ node in it's Router LSA
Why do we need (2). What do we do if an interface cycles?
Surely the most we should say is that we SHOULD establish a TLDP session with
the
OSPF router-id, if it is advertised as /32 prefix by the PQ node itself, else
any
other IP address for the node may be used.
other implementations may not be willing to accept T-LDP sessions on
non-loopback
adresses.
how do you suggest to distinguish between /32 belonging to the loopback
from /32 belonging to other interface types?
thanks,
Peter
/hannes
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
