Peter,

Then the draft should document that & the need for additional protocol
extensions if certainty is desired.
Then, there is the appropriate clarity & if a protocol extensions draft is
needed it can be considered in the
correct WG.

Alia


On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alia,
>
>
> On 13.12.2012 16:03, Alia Atlas wrote:
>
>> Peter,
>>
>> One of the goals of LFA & remote-LFA is for ease of manageability.  Why
>> are you pushing for requiring additional configuration, which I don't
>> see as adding any benefit from the flexibility, instead of documenting
>> the straightforward rules for automatic interoperabiity?
>>
>
> for most of the deployments, no config is required and picking the
> router-id or highest /32 address advertised by PQ node will work fine.
>
> For those cases where above does not work, there are no magic rules that
> will make it work in all cases. We would need a protocol extension to
> guarantee it.
>
> thanks,
> Peter
>
>
>> Alia
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Peter Psenak <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Bruno,
>>
>>     On 13.12.2012 15:50, [email protected]
>>     <mailto:bruno.decraene@orange.**com <[email protected]>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>         Peter,
>>
>>                 Unless it is believed that a local algorithm, without
>>                 coordination between
>>
>>             routers/vendor, can work in 100% of the cases. Is this your
>>             point?
>>
>>             local algorithm that picks any of the /32 IP addresses
>>             advertised by PQ
>>             node will work in 100% of cases.
>>
>>
>>         Does this include the case of an IS-IS L1/L2 router (ABR)
>>         redistributing into L2 the loopbacks of the routers in L1?
>>
>>
>>     ISIS may have a specific problem of not distinguishing between
>>     intra/inter/external prefixes. For that case some local policy on
>>     the computing node can be used to pick the ones that will work for
>> LDP.
>>
>>     thanks,
>>     Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>             thanks,
>>             Peter
>>
>>
>>                 Thanks,
>>                 Regards,
>>                 Bruno
>>
>>                     thanks,
>>                     Peter
>>                     ______________________________**___________________
>>                     rtgwg mailing list
>>                     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>                     
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/_**_listinfo/rtgwg<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/rtgwg>
>>                     
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/rtgwg<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>             ______________________________**
>> ______________________________**_______________________
>>             ______________________________**______________
>>
>>
>>
>>                 Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
>>                 informations
>>
>>             confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>>
>>                 pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans
>>                 autorisation. Si vous avez recu
>>
>>             ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>>
>>                 a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces
>>                 jointes. Les messages
>>
>>             electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>>
>>                 France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si
>>                 ce message a ete
>>
>>             altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>
>>
>>                 This message and its attachments may contain
>>                 confidential or privileged
>>
>>             information that may be protected by law;
>>
>>                 they should not be distributed, used or copied without
>>                 authorisation.
>>                 If you have received this email in error, please notify
>>                 the sender and delete
>>
>>             this message and its attachments.
>>
>>                 As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not
>>                 liable for messages
>>
>>             that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>
>>                 Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>         ______________________________**______________________________**
>> ______________________________**______________________________**_________
>>
>>
>>         Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des
>>         informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
>>         pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si
>>         vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
>>         a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les
>>         messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
>>         France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce
>>         message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>>
>>         This message and its attachments may contain confidential or
>>         privileged information that may be protected by law;
>>         they should not be distributed, used or copied without
>>         authorisation.
>>         If you have received this email in error, please notify the
>>         sender and delete this message and its attachments.
>>         As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable
>>         for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
>>         Thank you.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ______________________________**___________________
>>     rtgwg mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/_**_listinfo/rtgwg<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/__listinfo/rtgwg>
>>     
>> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/rtgwg<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Reply via email to