Acee, Just so I have your intent right:
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:15:07PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > Feel free to suggest validated common YANG typedefs for consideration by the > Routing Design Team…. I’m not worried about adding needed types for a few > more weeks. It is the few more quarters that I’m worried about. This is also > consistent with the direction we are receiving from the ADs. Are you saying that for the issues that have been raised about the route-target type (existing) that no action will happen without getting supplied a diff? -- Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
