Hi Jeff, On 6/21/17, 9:12 PM, "Jeffrey Haas" <[email protected]> wrote:
>Acee, > >Just so I have your intent right: > >On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:15:07PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> Feel free to suggest validated common YANG typedefs for consideration >>by the Routing Design Team…. I’m not worried about adding needed types >>for a few more weeks. It is the few more quarters that I’m worried >>about. This is also consistent with the direction we are receiving from >>the ADs. > >Are you saying that for the issues that have been raised about the >route-target type (existing) that no action will happen without getting >supplied a diff? Yes - I’ll add the site-of-origin, ipv6-site-of-origin, and ipv6-route-target types. I’ll also look at the geo-location as suggested by Robert and come back on the outcome. Thanks, Acee > >-- Jeff _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
