Acee, Also isn't MD5 / TCP-AO or security certificates common across multiple > routing components ? > > Videre RFC 8177… >
I was under assumption that this work aims at providing a comprehensive reference to common (used across protocols) elements either by defining them directly or providing references if they were already defined elsewhere. Apparently the latter part is missing from this document. You have IPX address family and you do not have RIP one which was way more > common over PE-CE then IPX :) ? > > RIP is not an address family, RIPv2 advertises AFs IPv4 and IPv6 (at least > that is all I’ve ever implemented)…. > Oh please ... It seemed obvious especially in this context. It is like mocking from someone who said "BGP" in the context of multi-protocol extensions rather then spelling BGPv4 each time. Thx, R.
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
