Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - I support Kathleen's DISCUSS. - I like the way sections 2.2 and 2.3 are constructed. Thanks. In section 2.4 that's a pity that we don't see which per instance oper states and stats are available. +--ro <per instance operational states> +--ro statistics +--ro <per instance statistics> I have to refer to an appendix to find the answer https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-vrrp-08#appendix-A Why don't you have the full tree as from the appendix in 2.X? - No need to include the WG chairs in the YANG module, as per 6087bis WG Chair: Jeff Tantsura <mailto:[email protected]> WG Chair: Chris Bowers <mailto:[email protected]> - The following two references must point to the working group documents [I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for Interface Management", draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00 (work in progress), August 2017. [I-D.bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis] Bjorklund, M., "A YANG Data Model for IP Management", draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00 (work in progress), August 2017. - Thanks for the appendix B. It's always useful. Note: I have not validated the instance. _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
