Hi Lin I agree with you. 5G integration can be in a separate draft. Thanks Hesham
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021, 4:23 PM Lin Han <[email protected]> wrote: > ========== trim the message for int-area size requirement > > > > Hi, Hesham > > > > The draft does not want to touch the territory of 3GPP. Having said that, > all radio, signal process, coding, wireless resource management, 4G/5G > integration, etc. are not in the scope of the draft. > > The intention of the draft is to only address the problems and solution > for satellite networking when routing and switching technologies are used. > > > > Thanks > > Lin > > > > *From:* Hesham ElBakoury <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, July 9, 2021 10:51 AM > *To:* Lin Han <[email protected]> > *Cc:* UTTARO, JAMES <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [Int-area] New Version Notification for > draft-lhan-problems-requirements-satellite-net-00.txt > > > > Hi Lin, > > Is the integration of 5G and satellite networks part of your research ?. > 3GPP has started the work on this integration and already has work items > (WI) for Rel 17 and 18 to address this issue. There are already few recent > related publications. For example, here is a recent survey: > https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9193893 > <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fdocument%2F9193893&data=04%7C01%7Clin.han%40futurewei.com%7C89587d9f2e774a787c0f08d94302285d%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C637614498840617824%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=%2BZsBixpOZ9Z2ktNZBPAU2%2FORKMJvXsoSln8MPxYmNTc%3D&reserved=0>. > I am not sure if O-RAN is currently working on this issue ? > > Thanks > > Hesham > > > >
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
