Hi folks,
After so many rounds of clarifications and a lot of work, now APN has a very clear scope as well as problem statement. We also have an use case draft of APN. We support the suggestion to have this APN focused WG and we would like to join the work on the APN framework. BR, Feng Yang 发件人: rtgwg [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Jeff Tantsura 发送时间: 2022年4月6日 01:15 收件人: RTGWG; rtgwg-chairs; [email protected] 主题: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dear RTGWG, APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the documents, including the scope of the problem and framework. This topic needs collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area. RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN. We would like to solicit the WG for opinions. Please note that comments about existing APN documents should be sent to [email protected]. This thread focuses on support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a new WG. Please send your comments, support, or objectiond. Thanks! Cheers, Yingzhen Jeff
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
