Hi WG， I have been interested in the APN work and It has made the remarkable progress such as problem statement, scope and the analysis work due to the extensive contribution.
So I support the formation of a new WG of APN, which could really help to handle the work such as framework. Regards, Peng [email protected] From: Jeff Tantsura Date: 2022-04-06 01:14 To: RTGWG; rtgwg-chairs; [email protected] Subject: RTGWG feedback on APN next steps Dear RTGWG, APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of the documents, including the scope of the problem and framework. This topic needs collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed are within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area. RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of different options and one option for handling such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN. We would like to solicit the WG for opinions. Please note that comments about existing APN documents should be sent to [email protected]. This thread focuses on support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a new WG. Please send your comments, support, or objectiond. Thanks! Cheers, Yingzhen Jeff
_______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
