Hi, I support the creation of an APN focused working group. The problem statement, requirements and framework have been properly documented and there’s a good consensus in the industry that this topic needs to be worked out. A dedicated WG seems, to me, as the best approach.
Thanks. s. > On Apr 5, 2022, at 7:14 PM, Jeff Tantsura <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear RTGWG, > > > APN has been presented at RTGWG multiple times, and we see the evolution of > the > documents, including the scope of the problem and framework. This topic needs > collaboration across WGs; we can foresee that not all issues to be addressed > are > within the charter of RTGWG and would span beyond the Routing area. > > RTGWG is chartered to provide a venue for new work, there are a couple of > different options and one option for handling > such new work would be to recommend the development of a new WG. > The Chairs would then want to recommend that the ADs consider forming a focus > WG, with a set of well defined deliverables and milestones (after delivery > the group would be shut down) to work on a framework for APN. > > We would like to solicit the WG for opinions. Please note that comments about > existing APN documents should be sent to [email protected]. This thread focuses > on > support or objection to recommending that the ADs consider the formation of a > new WG. > > Please send your comments, support, or objectiond. > Thanks! > > > Cheers, > Yingzhen Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg _______________________________________________ rtgwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
